Carnegie seemed to have believe that the best way to improve the community, or world, would be to educate groups so they could go out and continue to educate others. Carnegie was also big into promoting peace throughout the entire world. I can tell this by reading the wed site on Carnegie Trust and Institutions.
What is your opinion
of this approach? What is a counter
argument?
I think this is a good idea but i don't know how realistic it would have been. It seems easy to say this but hard to make it happen so I could of seen him having problems with that. The counter argument would be worrying about yourself before you worry about other people.
If you had hundreds
of millions of dollars to give away, what would you do?
If I had that much money i would probably donate a part of it to charity. I have always been involved in community service so I would do my part in that and make improve that as much as possible even if it just included me helping out a lot. Then after I did this I would use some of the money for some fun of my own. I have always wanted to go to Bora Bora and stay in one of the little houses over the water. So I would probably do that and then maybe take some other trips because that is a lot of money.
